Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Patents Your Rights Online

82-Year-Old Coder Trumps BT's Hyperlink Patent 273

grendelkhan writes: "According to Wired News, 82 year-old programmer, Bob Bemer, claims his creation of escape invalidates British Telecomm's hyperlink patent. He has no intentions on cashing in, he just wants BT to quit suing people and prove, in his own words: 'All this new patent stuff is crazy and counterproductive.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

82-Year-Old Coder Trumps BT's Hyperlink Patent

Comments Filter:
  • "Can we get him?"
  • Not just a coder... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Numair ( 77943 )
    He invented the ESCAPE KEY!

    The basis of his case rests on the fact that http:// is actually HTTP. Luckily, neither he nor IBM patented this invention.

    I want to meet this guy ... he sounds cool.
  • by lord_ashaman ( 180519 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @06:33PM (#3010490) Homepage
    That'll show big business what the old-timers can do! I reckon as punishment, BT should have to listen to one of his stories about either his long walks to school, duking german bullets and hiding from japanese commandos, or about the time he took a walk in the park, then went on the ferry and found a dime, that dime looked......

    The Pain will be never ending... Death to Stupid Lawsuits!!!!
    • Nah, he can hit them with a, "Back when I invented COBOL" story.

      That's more than enough...
      • by sphealey ( 2855 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @06:41PM (#3010549)
        Nah, he can hit them with a, "Back when I invented COBOL" story.
        Ha ha. Except that Adm. Grace Hopper, who did invent Cobol (as well as the idea of the assembler, which she didn't patent) was going full steam ahead (pun intended) in her 80's as a consultant for the Navy right up until her death. Or as the editor of Data Communications magazine once said to a 20-something web programmer designing a new subscription form: "Where is the radio button for 50+ years in experience in the industry?".

        sPh

        • You know what's kind of ironic? The fact that the first programmer - Ada Lovelace (okay, not programming as *we* know it but then neither are punch cards, IMO ) and the inventor of the most pervasive business language for decades - Grace Hopper - are women.

          And yet the industry is still largely male. Ironic.

          I just hope *I'm* still going at 82 like this guy.
          • I just hope *I'm* still going at 82 like this guy.

            I hope that when I'm 82 I spend my days lying on a beach, being served cold drinks by my 18-year-old wife.
          • by Untimely Ripp'd ( 513408 ) on Friday February 15, 2002 @11:54AM (#3013655)
            Miscellaneous comments have referred to the women who did the ballistics programming on the ENIAC. One person noted that the work was left to women because it was considered "secretarial".

            In fact, the women were not ordinary individuals, but were chosen for their mathematical aptitude. History largely ignored them. I read once that there was a big project reunion PR event, and none of them were invited, at least not until someone noticed and made a fuss.

            The real question is whether the work was considered secretarial because women could do it, rather than the other way around. My own observation is that quality secretarial work requires an astonishing level of skill. Behind every 5-million-dollar-a-year executive is a 35K/year secretary who actually has most of the responsibility for doing the executive's work. I would argue that the general contempt for secretarial work derives from a general contempt for women and anything they do.

            Anybody who has ever been in academia knows that the departments would collapse quickly and entirely without the cadre of highly-skilled and effective departmental secretaries.

            Oh, here's a link to a pdf [upenn.edu]. It took more work than I had time for to locate a really complete history of the women on ENIAC. I did however find this slashlink [slashdot.org] to a glowing Jon Katz review of a book that claims to tell the whole ENIAC story.
            • The real question is whether the work was considered secretarial because women could do it, rather than the other way around.
              Actually, most of those women had degrees in mathematics or physics - in some cases PhDs. Universities started admitting women (in very small numbers) to natural science classes as early as the 1880s. Certainly by the 1920s many women were graduating with degrees in mathematics. But very few of them were able to find employement in their fields of study, except as teachers - and mostly as elementary school teachers at that.

              When WWII hit many of those women jumped into engineering and science positions to fill in for the missing men and increased demand.

              After the war, most of them were sent back to the kitchen, as it were, in favor of men. However, since computing was so new there weren't men to "come back", and many women worked in the field from 1940-1960. For some reason however they were not replaced by the generation of young women who went to school during those years, so from 1960 - 1980 or so the percentage of women in computing fell drastically.

              sPh

    • by m_chan ( 95943 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @06:40PM (#3010541) Homepage
      I can imagine grandpa's voice.. The fax machine is nothing but a waffle iron with a phone attached..

      But...

      Mr. Bemer really does have a fascinating background. Read a bit about him here. [bobbemer.com]
      • The fax machine was invented around 1820 so I guess the basic patents for that one have expired! Unless Disney bought them...

        sPh

      • by m_chan ( 95943 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @06:56PM (#3010651) Homepage
        Off-topic? Moderator, follow the link.

        Anyway, here is more on Mr. Bemer [bobbemer.com] for others who do not follow the link:

        At Lockheed, he devised the first computerized 3-D dynamic perspective,
        prelude to today's computer animation.
        At IBM, he developed
        PRINT I (the first load-and-go computer method),
        FORTRANSIT (the first major proof of intercomputer portability,
        and the second FORTRAN compiler),
        Commercial Translator (a COBOL input), and
        XTRAN (an ALGOL predecessor).
        In 1957 March he was the first to describe commercial timesharing,
        which you now see as the Worldwide Web.
        In 1959 his internal IBM memo proposed word processing.
        The Identification and Environment Divisions of COBOL are due to him,
        as is the Picture Clause, which could have avoided the Year 2000 problem
        if used correctly.
        He coined the terms "COBOL", "CODASYL", and "Software Factory".
        He was the major force in developing ASCII (contributing 6 characters --
        ESCape (see that key), FS, GS, RS, US, and the backslash). He invented the
        escape sequence and registry concept, and is called the "Father of ASCII".
        He wrote the original scope and program of work for international and
        national computer standards, and chaired the international committee for
        programming language standards for eleven years.
        He was Program Chairman for ACM 70, promoter of National Computer
        Year (when the Y2K problem should have been solved), and edited the
        proceedings as the book "Computers and Crisis".
        Three Pioneer Days have honored him -- SHARE, COBOL, and FORTRAN.
        As editor of the Honeywell Computer Journal (the first A4-size publication
        [1971] in the U.S.) he innovated fiche-of-the-issue and multimedia publishing.
        He has published more than 110 articles in technical journals.
        In 1995 he received the Albion College Distinguished Alumnus Award.
        In 2000 he was named in the Delta Tau Delta "Rainbow" as one of the "100
        Most Influential Delts of the 20th Century".
        He is recognized as the first person in the world to publish warnings of the
        Year 2000 problem -- first in 1971, and again in 1979.
    • I reckon as punishment, BT should have to listen to one of his stories about either his long walks to school, duking german bullets...

      Good God. If this man can actually duke it out with German bullets, then even I want to hear that story!

  • by ConceptJunkie ( 24823 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @06:35PM (#3010506) Homepage Journal
    ...and license it to everyone in the world for nothing, except BT which would have to pay $1 billion.

    • He should get the patent to spur controversy over the subject of patents and get them cancelled.

      And to succeed, he could try changing the minds of companies that like patents, by charging them a lot of money.

      Isn't it so?
  • questions (Score:5, Interesting)

    by geekoid ( 135745 ) <dadinportland&yahoo,com> on Thursday February 14, 2002 @06:36PM (#3010508) Homepage Journal
    I'd like to get /. to do a question and answer with this guy.
    Programming since the '40s!
    • I'll second that. A thorough interview would also be nice. If this guy successfully crushes BT's suit, as seems very possible, he's definitely going to be making the rounds in the tech media. He might even get some nice words from John C. Dvorak.

    • He's an interesting guy, the Father of ASCII.

  • This guy truly deserves the patent. He seems like a person who would use it responsibly...

    If more people were like this think of where the idustry would be today.
  • by Masem ( 1171 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @06:40PM (#3010538)
    (I have submitted the following link, but since this was posted first, I expect it to be rejected..)

    Find the parallels between this (the BT case) and this patent lawsuit [com.com] that SightSound is bringing against CDNow but potentally all music/video sellers. (SightSound claims they own the common methods of selling music and video over the Internet, and the judge has allowed the case to go to trial).

    • by WNight ( 23683 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @09:36PM (#3011535) Homepage
      I wonder if the patent office will ever be sued (though there are some hoops to jump through to be able to do this) for gross negligence, or something. Some of the patents they're letting through are fraudulent, in a way that should be obvious to a member of the profession, let alone a supposedly skilled examiner.

      I can picture a company like AOL or Microsoft having the money to sue the PTO for reimbursment of their court costs against SightSound, or some other jerkwater company consisting of a patent and a flock of lawyers.

      While I'm sure big companies like IBM have patented their share of obvious gadgets they've also got some real patents and this general weakening of patents (what's a patent worth, every idiot can get one) stands to hurt them a lot.

      I'd love to see the government called to the carpet for their failures and the consequences those have had on the populace.
  • My Grandma (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Perdo ( 151843 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @06:41PM (#3010547) Homepage Journal
    84 years old, worked at berkley. Started in data entry then developed a macro to do some of it for her. A computer programmer in every sence of the word. Never made a name for herself.
    • Re:My Grandma (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 14, 2002 @07:08PM (#3010739)
      But she had a daughter/son who then had you, a loving grandson.

      This is infinitely more important than a name.

      Maybe she did things like this guy, from who we never heard before. This is truly being geek: doing things because they are cool, not because of fame or money.

      Congrats on your grandma.
      • Re:My Grandma (Score:3, Insightful)

        by Ooblek ( 544753 )
        Oh man, I'm getting all teary eyed and choked up after that one. Especially since thats the first time I've ever seen someone respond to a personal anecdote without some sort of, "Fuck you, my situation is 10 times more poignant than yours," attitude.

        Wow, and a marriage proposal on the same day. Love must be in the air. I hope my wife doesn't smell it because she'll want jewelry or something.

  • by Nathdot ( 465087 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @06:43PM (#3010562)
    If there's anybody claiming patents built on 'escape' technology then it's MS.

    Ctrl-Alt-Esc is the way I usually shut down my MS applications for godsake.

  • by goten ( 36521 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @06:44PM (#3010564) Homepage
    Next thing you know, he'll be making other outragous claims, such as he invented the question mark and will accuse chestnuts of laziness.
    • Well he does also claim to have invented ASCII and timeshare computing, so, umm, that question mark thing isn't far off :)

      And you probably know it's not the 'Esc' key on your keyboard, but the very idea of an escape sequence that he's talking about (which, of course, is could be triggered in some situations by pressing 'Esc').
  • by 2Bits ( 167227 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @06:44PM (#3010570)
    "Advanced technology only happens when people take a basic idea and add to it," Bemer said. "All this new patent stuff is crazy and counterproductive."


    This can't be said enough. Read my other post [slashdot.org] here

  • Good quote (Score:4, Interesting)

    by hether ( 101201 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @06:47PM (#3010600)
    I loved this quote from the article:

    "Technology develops through decades of work by many people. That's why I put my work into the public domain whenever possible."

    Why can't everybody think more like this old guy??
  • old school hacker. (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Restil ( 31903 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @06:52PM (#3010623) Homepage
    Back in the day, when programmers didn't even ponder the possibility of owning code, or patenting ideas. Back when multiuser operating systems had no passwords, and a commands called "KILL SYSTEM" that strangely enough, although being accessible to everyone, was never abused.

    How things have changed.

    -Restil
    • and a commands called "KILL SYSTEM" that strangely enough, although being accessible to everyone, was never abused.

      Then they will learn a hard lesson. A bank learnt it hard way when my friend accidentally issued 'DD SYSDUMP' 'SHUTDOWN' from a small JCL module for a system handling multi-million transactions for a bank.

      Somehow I think the system manager should be fired instead of firing my friend, who should be promoted for finding loopholes...but reality is reality. :/
    • Back in the day when programmers were mathematicians , that is.

      -Paul Komarek
  • IBM your friend (Score:3, Informative)

    by woolite ( 193398 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @06:53PM (#3010630) Homepage
    No, of course IBM didn't need software patents in their days.

    This gentlemen is obviously coming from the good old IBM school which taught that it is only ethical to rip your customer's arms and legs off if he decided to do such outragous things such as buying a used IBM computer - of course without licence for the operating system because that was not transferable.

    Such dirty deeds were thoroughly punished with selling the naughty guy a new licence at a price which would make him regret not to have bought a new machine in the first place.

    I guess the past seems to be quite romantic when you are 82.
  • by mr_don't ( 311416 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @06:57PM (#3010658)

    Harvey Ball, the creator of the smiley face image, (not the ascii [:-)] ) died not too long ago [freeipx.org]! He never trademarked his creation, however, but he did form a corporation to make smiley greeting cards and sell them with profits going to charity.

    However, some French Dude registered the trademark [cnn.com] in a bunch of countries, and Ball considered going after him to keep the smiley free.

    This story reminds us why something like the GPL is so important: It ensures that information that is free stays free! Public Domain resources (even smileys!) can be snatched up and made into commodities!

  • Even more absurd (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Blackheart2 ( 161473 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @07:00PM (#3010675) Homepage
    Bemer's claim to escape sequences is even more absurd than BT's claim to hyperlinking. (Thankfully, he's using it to subvert BT's claim, and not pressing it independently.) The notion of "escapes" is so abstract and general that you could apply it to almost anything, even outside the realm of computers. For example, the idea of interrupting someone in the middle of a conversation, or the idea of changing lanes on the freeway, or any kind of multiplexing.

    These sorts of concepts which are being pressed at the patent office may be new to some people, but they are not new. In particular, this idea of escapes would have been completely obvious to anybody with a little mathematical training, in 1950 or 1900 or even 100BC.

    You could argue that the application of the idea is novel, but differentiating an abstract notion from its collection of concrete instances is a tricky thing, and properly the subject of philosophy and metamathematics, not the patent office's incompetent review staff.

  • by Sarcazmo ( 555312 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @07:02PM (#3010691)
    And so does wired.

    If I read it right, he invented the escape sequence. Like in a shell when you type

    rm Stupid\ File\ that\ a\ window\$ lu\$er created.mp3

    Those kinds of escapes, the ones that are used to within normal text to denote something to be handled non-literally. In other words, he is actually claiming that HTML uses escape sequences &lt and &gt to denote special handling of hyperlinks, same with the ampersand escaped characters, like I just used.

    The escape key has nothing to do with this.
    • is actually claiming that HTML uses escape sequences

      Which is total bunk, just like the case itself. HTML doesn't have escapes (well, except &amp;), it has syntax

      • Yes the escapes have a syntax.
        Without the syntax, nothing knows it's an escape.
        English has escapes so you can talk about the period at the end of this sentence.
        HTML has escapes, otherwise scripts and comments would show up as text.
        Shifted a is A, but both are the letter 'A'. Greek Alpha would be a shifted 'A' if you had a Greek shift. Shifted 6 is ^. Looks like an escape that everybody is accustomed to. Probably called an escape because it escapes from the corner the designer had painted himself into.
    • by Anonymous Coward
      If I read it right, he invented the escape sequence. Like in a shell when you type

      rm Stupid\ File\ that\ a\ window\$ lu\$er created.mp3


      That is not an escape. That is a "literal next". The ASCII escape character does not mean "use the next character literally", it says "I'm starting some sort of command using the next one or more characters".

      That's nothing like the '/' in a URL, and it's not HTTP. This "prior art" is nonsense, but it's nonsense fighting nonsense.
    • rm: cannot remove `Stupid File that a window$': No such file or directory
      rm: cannot remove `lu$er': No such file or directory
      rm: cannot remove `created.mp3': No such file or directory

      sorry, couldn't resist
  • by bahtama ( 252146 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @07:03PM (#3010699) Homepage
    Two words.... BAD. ASS.

    http://www.bobbemer.com/a-plate1.JPG [bobbemer.com]

    The Main Page - http://www.bobbemer.com [bobbemer.com]

  • Memex, Vannevar Bush, "As We May Think"... http://www.site.uottawa.ca/~dduchier/misc/vbush/aw mt.html
  • by lkaos ( 187507 ) <anthony@NOspaM.codemonkey.ws> on Thursday February 14, 2002 @07:12PM (#3010770) Homepage Journal
    This author absolutely does not know what he's talking about (or there's no merit to this man's claim - which I think is unlikely).

    He mentions then term 'escape sequence' and then somehow binds that to the escape key. The only relation between an 'escape sequence' and an escape key is that the begining on the traditional ansi escape sequence starts with the same code the escape key generates.

    An 'escape sequence' according to Webopedia is:

    A sequence of special characters that sends a command to a device or program. Typically, an escape sequence begins with an escape character, but this is not universally true.


    The fact is that the escape sequence in a traditional hyperlink is the information encoded after the filename (that's encoded with URL-encoding). It's all those neat %20 characters.

    Check out this quote:

    Escape's powers are huge but at its most basic level, it is a command that tells a computer to make a shift in its processing - allowing a user to move up, down or sideways through files, programs or networks. For example, every press of a phone key that allows a user to move through an automated information service is an invocation of Berner's escape principle.

    This is just absurd. Escape sequences special sequences encoded other data. A telephone navigation system is merely a command driven system. Nothing is escaped. By this logic, every time anyone tells anything to do anything they are invocating Berner's escape principle.

    I understand the guy's position, but Wired really blew it on this story. I'm suprised this made it past the technical editors...

    BTW: The article mentions the '/' character as being an escape sequence, but this is not true. If they are referring to the href of a URL, then since the protocol preceeds the '/', this would not be an example of an escape sequence. I think the real issue is the escape sequences preceeded by '%' signs.
    • The more I read this the more I think "interrupt" and not "escape".

      An interrupt "tells a computer to make a shift in its processing". At the hardware level it's an indication to give the CPU to a handler to deal with whatever event just happened. At the software level, it tells the application to stop what it's doing and maybe process a new command.

      So are interrupts an invocation of the "escape principle" or is the "escape principle" a type of interrupt.

      Hmm.. wonder who owns the patent on interrupts?

    • by zurab ( 188064 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @08:46PM (#3011281)
      Escape sequences special sequences encoded other data. A telephone navigation system is merely a command driven system. Nothing is escaped.

      Go back and read your own escape sequence definition that you got from Webopedia, as long as it is a "sequence of special characters" that send a command to a device or program it is an escape sequence. Then you have to get into the argument of "pressing 4 on the telephone dial is not a special character". What is a special character by the way? Would pressing #4 while interrupting phone message recording (to take you back to the main menu) be considered as a "sequence of special characters"? IOW, fighting over definitions does not make sense.

      What is rightly an issue, is that the BT patent on hyperlinks was not an invention when it was approved. And, one of the examples of similar practices is dated from way long ago, and you can call it escape sequence, or call it something else if you like.

      URL, then since the protocol preceeds the '/', this would not be an example of an escape sequence. I think the real issue is the escape sequences preceeded by '%' signs.

      All those can be escape sequences, including an HTML tag on a web page since it modifies the meaning of a regular text and, instead, sends a "command" to the browser ("device or program") to interpret the included text otherwise.
  • This guy is amazing. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by phoenix_orb ( 469019 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @07:13PM (#3010782)
    He put the slash in Slashdot (a slash being an interupt, i.e. http\

    He put the backslash in ASCII code (without it, where would DOS be now.... oh, I mean.. nevermind)

    He Texas Plates are "ASCII". That just rocks in itself.

    He helped invent COBOL. I learned to program on COBOL. I can't even imagine the fortitude trying to make an entire programming language. The old programmers had it really tough. Imagine wanting to program in a high level, so you have to design and implement a high level language yourself.

    The whole reason this got out is simply because he is fed up with all of these outrageous patents. Hyperlinking... bah, One click purchasing.

    He is one of us (albiet probably the oldest)

    Slashdot would do good for itself to do an interview with him, maybe even make him the honorary "grandpa" of slashdot.

    • Slashdot would do good for itself to do an interview with him, maybe even make him the honorary "grandpa" of slashdot.

      Would that make his user id -1?
    • Actually, creating a language isn't too difficult (most college students who take CS, including myself, have done language and compiler design). The difficult part is getting the compiler to parse and recognize it.
  • by MadFarmAnimalz ( 460972 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @07:24PM (#3010852) Homepage
    It occurs to me that it is a sad thing that we have to rely on someone like Mr. Bemer to do the job of the government and protect the hapless consumer from the wrath of the corporation and its bevy of lawyers.

    There was a post on here which expressed optimism that Mr. Bemer seemed like a responsible enough person to grant the patent. What patent? Why should this be patented to begin with? The system should be rigged such that philanthrophic caretakers should not have to appear; what happens next time when BT decides to patent the power button?

    The system is failing the consumer/citizen here. I think deeper introspection is required of the legal system and the IP code.
  • YEAH BABY!

    'bout time a pattentholder isn't lookin to cash in...
  • by Nathdot ( 465087 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @07:38PM (#3010946)
    Which one played him in the movie.

    Wasn't Bemer portrayed by Steve McQueen. Those damned Nazis. If it wasn't for the 'escape' we never would have witnessed one of the finest war movies of all time.

    I dunno what it is but it's funny to think of an 82 yr old programmer throwing a baseball back forth against his cubicle wall.

    :)
  • by yo303 ( 558777 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @07:39PM (#3010951)
    I agree with what he's doing (BT's patent is ridiculous), but the article was wrong here:

    Had Bemer or IBM, his employer at the time, patented the escape concept, he or they could own a sizable chunk of the world's technology right now.

    If he had indeed patented this in 1960, the patent would have expired by now. Even if it took a few years for him to get the patent, the 17 years would be long over.

    Unless he purposely dragged on the application process for years to make the patent last longer, like The Patent King. [business2.com]

    Now, there is a 20 year limit from the year of filing.

    IANAL, BIWOWALF3Y.

    yo.

    • Had Bemer or IBM, his employer at the time, patented the escape concept, he or they could own a sizable chunk of the world's technology right now.

      If he had indeed patented this in 1960, the patent would have expired by now. Even if it took a few years for him to get the patent, the 17 years would be long over.

      Very true, but since the concept is so useful and pervasive, there would have been a monopoly that would have been very difficult to break. Others might have started comming in in the 80's, but it would have taken almost until now for there to be any sizable dent in their share.
  • by BigBir3d ( 454486 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @07:40PM (#3010956) Journal
    very cool that the old guys knew that this stuff belonged in the public domain. now if we could only convince that generation following them!
  • by jonathanpost ( 415904 ) on Thursday February 14, 2002 @07:46PM (#3010986)
    Ummmm... Ted Nelson is neither British nor a scientist. He merely invented hypertext and hypermedia.

    "Other examples of hyperlinks also predate BT's patent, including a 1965 book by British scientist Ted Nelson..."

    How do I know? Because I co-implemented the first working hypertext and hypermedia on personal computers, for Ted, and demo'd it at the world's first personal computer conference, in Philadelphia, in -- was it 1976?

    That was before Radio Shack, IBM, or Apple even made personal computers...

    Ted Nelson is merely a grandfather of the World Wide Web. Remind me -- what exactly did BT do except shove electrons through wires?

    Wired and BT are BOTH wrong.

    I say: fly Ted Nelson by Concorde to the trial and treat him as the VIP he is, pay hom $1,000 and hour as an epert witness, and then give him a share of the winnings in court!
  • I don't support BT, but the escape key sequence has at best a tenuous connection to hyperlinks. Just because you need some kind of keyword sequence to embed a link in text does not mean that this embodies the whole idea of a hyperlink, infact it has almost nothing to do with hyperlinking. The REAL prior art has already been discovered, we don't need to claim unrelated art defeats the BT patent claims, this will only distract and strengthen BT's invalid claim.

"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra

Working...