Update On The Jon Johansen Trial 194
nordicfrost writes "The trial against Jon Johansen goes on. Today, John Hoy of the DVD CCA was examined by phone by the defense and the prosecutor in Oslo. We have set up a page to follow the main events in the trial here, in English. The documentation of evidence, and the fact that Hoy didn't answer the phone when the court called, delayed the trial so the final proceedings may not be finished before Monday afternoon." Update: 12/12 23:50 GMT by T : This wasn't really a Science story ...
Good thing (Score:1)
Re:Good thing (Score:1, Redundant)
Re:Good thing (Score:1)
Re:Good thing (Score:1)
Where do I file a bug report for the world? Hopefully, God will be switching to Bugzilla soon.
Re:Good thing (Score:1)
Re:Good thing (Score:1)
Hopefully He will be switching to Open Source!
He has, you come with it, it's called DNA
Unfortunately there is no accompanying lisence so some medical companies are making closed derivative works based on the original source
Re:Good thing You smoking crack? (Score:3, Insightful)
I speak English,Spanish, Portequese, and a smattering of french. Born and bred in the US.
I would say that comment is far from the truth though. Even though Slashdot is a US based site so english the language and maybe the rest of you guys are interlopers. So why should citizens of an English Speaking country, visiting an english speaking site, be expected to speak another language? You like slashdot, so you read it in English.
I tend to disagree with that comment because with all the anti-american sentiment that floats around here that most people are foreigners(Canadians included). So I would say I good many of us speak another language.
I agree that many people in the US dont have another language when they should.
1. They dont see the necessity, as English is the dominant business language in the world. You need it for international business.
2. You go anywhere and people speak English because we are big tourists.
3.The US is not in proximity with other countries so we do not have the necessity or luck of having to learn another langauge. Europe you guys are all bordered next to each other, short hops in between, easy to travel. Easy to learn another langauge.
I think you are trolling. 45% of the US speaks spanish I beleive. We latinos are falling out the woodwork.
And most people on slashdot are fairly intelligent, including us North Americans, well traveled, and gasp, speak other languages.
We aint as dumb as you think. Course then Germans are all Nazis, Italian women are all Harry, I could go on.
Jeez
Puto
Re: Pass it along. (Score:2, Funny)
Smattering = smatter.
English Speaking = English-speaking.
"I tend to disagree with that comment--"
You get the comment a lot, then?
"because with all the anti-american sentiment that floats around here that most people are foreigners(Canadians included)"
Oh, the prejudiced foreigners. I'm sure everyone is suitably sorry to have tread on your mighty country.
"You go anywhere and people speak English because we are big tourists."
No, they speak English because the tourists don't speak any other languages.
"The US is not in proximity with other countries so we do not have the necessity or luck of having to learn another langauge."
French. Spanish. Hawaiian.
"--bordered next to each other--Easy to learn another langauge."
Unfortunately agains common beliefs, being in motion doesn't make you learn faster.
" 45% of the US speaks spanish I beleive."
No, it's 95%. Of the latino group.
"Italian women are all Harry"
I don't even want to go there.
</tongue>
Re: Pass it along. (Score:2, Interesting)
No, they speak English because the tourists don't speak any other languages.
No, it's because English is the new lingua franca. Anyone who wants to get along in international business had better learn English. Even businessmen with no customers in anglophone countries learn English, because it's the new common tongue. I once spoke with an anti-aircraft artilleryman in the Finnish military. To learn about the complex systems his unit uses, he had go to classes where they were manufactured: in Russia and France. What language do you think the classes were held in? English, of course!
This is not to say that Americans should not learn more foreign languages (I myself speak French, German and Italian), but we are often in the enviable position of being able to expect other people to learn our language. This is, of course, unfair, but it's also reality.
Re: Pass it along. (Score:2, Insightful)
They buy their AA-weaponry from the guys they are most likely to use them at? Weird.
Re: Pass it along. (Score:1)
International politics are rarely ever logical.
Re: Pass it along. (Score:1)
Re: Pass it along. (Score:1)
We Americans all know a foreign language. It's English, after all.
Re:Good thing You smoking crack? (Score:2)
Better understanding of this point right here would probably reduce some of the negative stereotypes about Americans. The US is HUGE. We're not self centered, we're overloaded with what we have. We're not geographically ignorant, we have enough to know about the US before branching out into other countries. (I couldn't point to Afghanistan on a map any more than a German could point to Kansas City.)
I realize this is off topic, but
Re:Good thing You smoking crack? (Score:1)
I couldn't point to Afghanistan on a map any more than a German could point to Kansas City
If you're going to jump to the defense of the notorious lack of geographic awareness in the US, at least make your arguments level. Afghanistan is a country, Kansas City is a might smaller than a country.
Had you said "I couldn't point to Afghanistan on a map any more than a German could point to Algeria," then you would be making a meaningful and FAIR argument. As it were, you are simply confirming the world's understanding of how important the rest of the world is to the US. Besides, most Americans probably couldn't point out KC on a map.
The US is HUGE. We're not self centered, we're overloaded with what we have.
Indeed, you certainly are huge.
Re:Good thing You smoking crack? (Score:1)
Re:Good thing You smoking crack? (Score:2)
I am only fluent in English. I have studied a few years of other languages, but no where near fluent.
Re:Good thing You smoking crack? (Score:1)
Re:Good thing You smoking crack? (Score:1)
consider yourself lucky. a native USian I still have quite the muddle trying to think in english. My twin sibling and I were allowed to use twinnish until kindergarten and i still get odd looks from cow-orkers when i lack the english to describe something and manage to not realise I'm going on with words they probably couldn't pronounce (the 'gsth' and 'ruuml' sounds seem to come up a lot.)
Re:Good thing You smoking crack? (Score:2)
Most people are idiots, IME.
Most Americans probably could not find Montana on a political map of the Unites States.
I think I could do that.
They definately could not find Monaco, Andorra, or Luxemborg.
Well, they wouldn't be on a map of the United States! Assuming you meant on a European map then you've picked three of the hardest (outside the Balkans) and I'd have a little trouble with that.
I'm British, BTW; I think you're being a bit hard on Americans.
TWW
Re:Good thing You smoking crack? (Score:2)
Re:Good thing You smoking crack? (Score:3, Insightful)
The irresponsible parroting of statistics [ucpress.edu] is a far more pervasive and detrimental social phenomenon than American ignorance or arrogance.
American's look ignorant overseas because of a simple phenomenon that is certainly not confined to the USA: Ignorant people are loudmouths. Ignorant people believe their prejudices are facts, and they give voice to every damnfool idea that comes into their heads because they do not know that they do not know anything [apa.org]
It would be best if you took a good look at your own attitudes and inflammatory statements before you accuse Americans as a class, as if there were a monolithic "American" opinion or personality.
I'm not proud of of my country's present administration. My overall impression is that George W. Bush may be one of the least intelligent people to hold the Presidency in many years. I understand that the world is nervous about a "cowboy" President backed by an angry population, and so am I. But remember that while this man appears popular in our polls, this is more a result of our collective outrage than an endorsement of the policies of this administration. Remember he was barely elected, and some still dispute that he was elected. In two years there will be another election, and even if he wins, in four more years he will be out.
Will we start another war? Personally, I doubt it. But let me ask you this: Would there be UN inspectors in Iraq right now if the threat had not been built to a very real level? Diplomacy sometimes has a gunboat component. So even here, while I do not personally know what our government intends, an intelligent person may draw a very different conclusion from the facts than you appear to do.
Ignorance and arrogance are clearly not confined to the United States. The fact that America weilds vast military power does, I grant you, make American ignorance and arrogance of greater import. But even here, consider that North Korea is flexing its nuclear muscles again because Pyongyang (Wow! He knows a foreign capital!) has made the reasonable calculation that we cannot build up the interational tolerance nor perhaps the military capability for two engagements a continent apart. Perhaps America is under greater constraints than you realize.
So this jejune attitude of superiority requires some additional reflection, perhaps, on both sides of the ocean.
And the main reason to use English (Score:2)
If you want to write something in one language that has the greatest chance of being understood by people form all across teh world, choose English.
Re:Good thing You smoking crack? (Score:1)
Sorry man, I'm a dumbass.
Re:Good thing You smoking crack? (Score:1)
Re:Good thing (Score:2)
--Joey
Re:Good thing (Score:2)
(I'm Norwegian and live in Florida, speaking Norwegian and 6 other languages).
The initial post in this thread is one of the causes to why USA is in more armed conflicts with other countries than any other country on this planet is. Namely arrogance!
Re:Good thing (Score:1)
Re:Good thing (Score:2)
--Joey
court tv dvd box set? (Score:1)
Re:court tv dvd box set? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:court tv dvd box set? (Score:4, Funny)
I've got an excerpt from the court reporter:
Re:What is that? (Score:2)
Sadly, I didn't put as much effort into it as I would like to have. Most of what you see there is a copy/paste from a Geocities site. heh.
Re:court tv dvd box set? (Score:2)
TV from courts is a nasty American fenomena. And it sucks, because laywers pose more than they work, same for the prosecution.
Re:court tv dvd box set? (Score:2)
You mean enema?
In case of Slashdotting - International Site. (Score:1, Redundant)
Text:
OSLO DISTRICT COURT (VG Nett) - There's nothing in the CSS-license stopping license holders from making a DVD player for Linux, says John Hoy, President and COO of the DVD Copy Control Association.
Tips en venn om denne saken! - Se dagens mest populære tips!
Få nyhetene om The trial against Jon Johansen først - abonnér på VG Nett Nyhetsbrev!
Trykk her!
In the penal trial against DVD-Jon, the case reached John Hoy, President and COO of DVD CCA Thursday morning. DVD CCA and Motion Pictures Association are the offended parts in the trial.
- I am calling from Oslo District Court, can you please call back us? Was the message on John Hoy's answering machine this morning. And when pohne contact finally was established between Oslo and Phoenix, Arizona, a statment on what Jon Johansen broke into followed.
Clear demand
Content Scrambling System (CSS) is made up of an encryption part and a license part. An encryption of DVD movies was, according to Hoy's statement, a clear demand from the film industry for accepting a high-quality format like DVD.
- All DVD movies would be a perfect copy, Hoy explained via interpreter.
A central point in the defense case of attorney Halvor Manshaus is that there was no DVD player for Linux in 1999.
- A company that recieves a CSS license can use the technology in any operating system, Hoy said to prosecutor Inger Marie Sunde.
- If someone wants to make a player for Linux, there's nothing in the license stopping that, he added later on.
Interested in timing
Manshaus was interested in the point of time for DVD CCAs taking over of the responsibility for handing out of CSS-licenses.
- We handed out licenses from the latter part of September 1999, and became the sole entity or publisher of CSS licenses from mid December 1999, Hoy said.
Manshaus made no point of the fact that this after DVD-Jon made the decryption tool DeCSS available mid September 1999.
Another interesting topic Manshaus touched in his examination was wether any clauses on region control existed in the license agreement between DVD CCA and the manufacturers of DVD players.
Would not comment
Hoy was read the clause in the definition list describing what is copy protection means in the CSS license agreement. The encryption part is not mentioned specifically there, and Hoy did not want to comment on what DVD CCA recognizes as the legal definition of copy protection and Manshaus finished off his questioning.
- I can't get himto answer the question, Manshaus said.
Before Hoy testified by phone, DVD-Jon was asked to go into detail on some of his answers from earlier in the trial. Prosecutor Inger Marie Sunde was mostly occupied by stating dates for the turn of events in autumn 1999, whil the defense was busy leveling out negative statements about the Linux community, that DVD-Jon was quoted with in September 1999.
Re:In case of Slashdotting - International Site. (Score:2)
How come the article has the 'Movies' icon? (Score:1)
Re:How come the article has the 'Movies' icon? (Score:1)
Re:How come the article has the 'Movies' icon? (Score:1)
Heck with the "Movies" icon, what I want to know is, why the heck is it listed as a "Science" article?!? That's even less obvious.
Doesn't it set things off poorly... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Doesn't it set things off poorly... (Score:1)
The court should have checked him off the prosecutors list of witnesses.
Re:Doesn't it set things off poorly... (Score:2)
Somebody please tell me why they deserve to win this case.
Lee Kaiwen Taiwan, ROC
Re:Doesn't it set things off poorly... (Score:1)
Because they have God-given right to rip off, rob and abuse "consumers" in any other way necessary for them to get more money. At least they seem to think so
Re:Doesn't it set things off poorly... (Score:2)
The person (can't remember his name... Facuss or something) releasing some source code under GPL, used in DeCSS was to be examined by telephone from Japan. He was supposed to meet at the Norwegian embassy in Tokyo, but the court was not able to reach him easely. Too bad, because he could give us the inside info on wether the decsstruth.txt document is true or not.
Who is he? (Score:5, Informative)
More info on the trial at Google News [google.com] (Wouldnt it be cool if slashdot automagicly added a google news link to stories to show all relevant links?)
Re:Who is he? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Who is he? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Who is he? (Score:2)
Don't laugh. It's actually starting to happen. [go-mono.com]
Re:Who is he? (Score:3, Interesting)
absence (Score:2)
Here's a clue.... (Score:1)
Jaysyn
Re: (Score:2)
DeCSS and such (Score:3, Insightful)
I think the key here is rather than trying to put this guy away, DVD manufacturers should work with the DeCSS technology to find a happy medium. Obviously, free OS's will need some way to play DVD's, so it makes sense that the technology should expand to include these users. Just putting people on trial in hopes that all these issues will go away is ludicrous. If DVD manufacturers are worried about their products being pirated, imagine the response when the creator of DeCSS gets jailed. This isn't the way to go about it.
Of course, people who can legitimately play DVD's shouldn't exactly be going around DeCSS'ing every DVD and distributing it on Kazaa or your filesharing program of choice. Abusing the technology is just as big a problem as those trying to shut it down.
Re:DeCSS and such (Score:2, Interesting)
Not the part Jon wrote. He violated the GPL by taking other peoples "excellent code" that was released GPL. Check the real history on it (In regards to LiViD) and understand that Jon was just trying to be greedy and stupid.
Granted, it's bunk he's on trial but he's not a saint. He also has posted rather inflammatory things about Linux (and totes FreeBSD) on mailing lists before he tried to harness the Linux communities support.
Re:DeCSS and such (Score:1)
I didn't really mean to say that Jon was a saint; but still, like you said, he shouldn't be on trial. There are bigger problems in the world than the abuse of DeCSS.
Re:DeCSS and such (Score:4, Insightful)
Whether the defendant is a good guy or a bad guy should be irrelevant in any legal case in a civilized state. It shouldn't matter. It's just not relevant. Bring him to trial for infringement of the GPL instead, or for not being a good poster boy. It's still irrelevant to this case. You're not a good poster boy yourself for free software, and neither am I, Stalin, Hitler, GWB, Saddam Hussein or Mother Theresa. It's hardly illegal.
Of course, if his motives were to pirate films (which I doubt - why would he post to the LiVid mailing lists then?), he could be judged for contributing to copyright infringement. But he has contributed to developement of free DVD players for Linux, QNX, Windows, *BSD, BeOS, etc., just by releasing the source. Breaking the CSS algorithm was the most important thing about DeCSS. Today it's just an old-fashioned prototype to libdvdcss, used in most free DVD players. And by the way, Jon Johansen has [videolan.org] contributed to such players. (Just search for his last name on that page.)
The point is: the priciple of DeCSS is important to the developement of free DVD software. Without DeCSS, no libdvdcss: no xine, no MPlayer, no Ogle, no VideoLAN. We need to break the encryption to read DVD's. And we need the right to do so.
Re:DeCSS and such (Score:3, Insightful)
As I stated in my post, I fully agree with this. The case against him seems defunct anyway, as they are trying him for copyright infringement laws that don't apply to film. I don't expect to see him serve any time for this, assuming the defense adequately describes what he in fact did.
And by the way, Jon Johansen has [videolan.org] contributed to such players. (Just search for his last name on that page.)
I didn't say he did, but the core of DeCSS he didn't write (as he claimed he did) -- I refuse to sit back while people tote him as the author of a well known software package that he stole from others (namely, the LiViD author, CSSAuth.c) so I post that he was not a saint.
I'm glad he did do this though, because he seems to be politically-minded enough to get a rally of support behind him, including the EFF so that he can walk away free.
The point is: the priciple of DeCSS is important to the developement of free DVD software. Without DeCSS, no libdvdcss: no xine, no MPlayer, no Ogle, no VideoLAN. We need to break the encryption to read DVD's. And we need the right to do so.
Absolutely, I'm in full agreement. But Jon Johansen was not an intrinsic part of this process. His trial serves as a better asset, instead of his code. I believe it will be one more victory leading to our right.
Re:DeCSS and such (Score:5, Interesting)
This is what you're missing. The DVD Forum people don't want a "happy medium". They want three things:
#2 is the biggie insofar as linux goes first off becuase "the linux community" will not truly be happy using a closed source video player-- there will always be the person upset he couldn't play dvds on his 10-year-old sparc because the "approved" propeitary player is x86 and PPC only. But much more importantly, this is a problem because open source platforms inherently empower the user. In the end, the user is in control of everything on the OS. This scares the DVD forum. Remember: In order for Apple to get the DVD forum to let them license their dvd player, Apple was forced to write the dvd player in such a way that it refuses to run if MacsBug, the system-level debugger is running, because MacsBug lets you do things like branch to unscheduled subroutines at random moments, and such would have allowed people to take screenshots while the DVD is running! This is a fairly big thing, MacsBug is a versatile tool that LOTS of people run for various reasons, and it is the best/only way to debug many pieces of software. Because there were potential uses of MacsBug that allowed the user to evade the control the DVD forum wants, macsbug users have to switch the thing off and restart anytime they want to watch a DVD.Given this, why on earth do you think the dvd forum would be okay with allowing any DVD player, even a propeitary one, on an OS where everything in the OS including the device drivers can be re-coded by the user?
Of course, the macsbug thing is a sham: a simple machine-code hack patch thing which is very readily available will allow anyone to alter the dvd player app so that it doesn't notice macsbug. But despite this, Apple still has to leave the "no macsbug" code in the OS 9 version of the DVD player, lest they offend the DVD consortium's illusion of complete control, which they must for some reason maintain to themselves at all costs.
If the DVD people were interested in a happy medium, i'm almost certain one would have been reached. Remember, the mathematical flaws in CSS remained uncracked for *years* while CSS was just being used for satellite TV; CSS was only knocked over after millions of linux users were left with the alternatives of either someone hacking CSS, or not being able to use products they paid good money for without booting into windows. The "hackers" can sometimes compromise.. but the DVD forum people cared more about control than compromise, and so the LiViD people went around the DVD forum... and we now have DeCSS.
Screw the happy medium. (Score:5, Insightful)
1. They want to recieve license fees for every dvd-capable video player in existence.
2. They want every dvd-capable video player in existence to work by their rules-- i.e., the ones that allow content producers to completely set what it is possible to do with each disc.
I agree, but think you miss the point here:
the linux community" will not truly be happy using a closed source video player-- there will always be the person upset he couldn't play dvds on his 10-year-old sparc because the "approved" propeitary player is x86 and PPC only. But much more importantly, this is a problem because open source platforms inherently empower the user.
That user has every right to be angry, as do you. The DVD consortium has, with help from a few friends, make it a crime for you to figure out how to use your own equipment or even tell others how to do the same. It's a concept that matters and should not be belittled with absurd examples like trying to make a computer that does not have an IDE interface run a DVD player. Trade secrets should have no force outside of a signed contract, and should never trump free speech. My purchasing a DVD player is not equivalent to me signing a contract. "Open" OS only empower users to the extent that they have source code. If you don't have the power to help your friends do things there will be no free code and no Open OS and you will be at the mercy of those who exploit you to maintain tools you can't use.
Re:DeCSS and such (Score:2)
1) DVDs fit in computer hardware (DVD drives) - VHS films do not fit in Betamax hardware
2) No one is stealing anything. They're simply getting purchased products to work on their equipment.
3) There is no law against distributing information on getting a VHS film to play in a Betamax player.
If I owned a BM player that was easily modded to a VHS player back when VHS had obviously won the battle, I'd mod it rather than purchasing a whole new player.
Thank you.
Re:DeCSS and such (Score:2)
Some waited to buy them until they could. The MPAA should be paying royalties to the authors of DeCSS for increasing the sales of their DVDs.
Auto-slashdot on purpose? (Score:1, Redundant)
This auto-slashdotting appears the day after several Norwegian papers accuse the main tabloid competitor of VG for cheating in the national "we-have-the-most-popular-web-site-in-Norway". The competitor had made a popular Norwegian game site give all its web hits to them.
Some people may think that auto-slashdotting is more of a cheat, but as the Jon Johansen case shows, what "some people" may think is not necessarily what counts. Money rule.
Not a hero (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Not a hero (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Not a hero (Score:1)
Well, that link is certainly helpful. Nothing proves your point better than a rant filled with mispelled words and poor grammar, written by someone who won't even sign his name to it.
Re:Not a hero (Score:2)
It's like fighting a forest fire: you stamp out the embers before they burst into flame. It's the metaphor the "other guys" are using, so why not use it to portray THEM as the fire? Why let them have a legal precedent?
Hoy didn't answer the phone... (Score:3, Funny)
CSS vs. CSS (Score:5, Interesting)
Here in English link broken (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Here in English link broken (Score:2)
"In the penal trial against DVD-Jon, the case reached John Hoy, President and COO of DVD CCA Thursday morning. DVD CCA and Motion Pictures Association are the offended parts in the trial.
- I am calling from Oslo District Court, can you please call back us? Was the message on John Hoy's answering machine this morning. And when pohne contact finally was established between Oslo and Phoenix, Arizona, a statment on what Jon Johansen broke into followed."
Come on, that's Funny!
Re:Here in English link broken (Score:2)
I was planning to invite Jon a readers-asks-the-questions type of online meeting with Jon, also in English, but that's off now I guess.
OT- apology Re:Here in English link broken (Score:2)
FYI: I had roughly 15 minutes to translate this article yesterday, and no spellchecker.
Well in those circumstances, I wouldn't have done it. It looks amateurish. If you had explained at the top of the articles what the circumstances were, people wouldn't have been critical. I've done translation, and I know how difficult it is. Please don't think I was trying to be mean. I admit it was a cheap joke, but it wasn't meant to be hurtful. Humor doesn't translate well, and I apologize if I offended you.
cheers,
p.s. Thanks for posting the response instead of just leaving the negative mod. It allowed me to respond.
Re:Here in English link broken (Score:1)
Heh heh, thanks for posting this! Even if some complete moron modded this down, I think it's the funniest thing I've read all day! =)
Re:Here in English link broken (Score:1)
Trial was beginning
Judge: What happen?
Prosecution: Jon set up us the DeCSS.
The secret of Babelfish (Score:3, Funny)
It looks like you've discovered the "technology" behind Babelfish.
Difference between patent and copyright (Score:4, Insightful)
What Hoy is insinuating here, is that the DVD CCA has a government granted monopoly on anything CSS related. Judge Kaplan bought it, but it's simply not true. If the DVD CCA wanted a monopoly on decoding DVDs, they should have applied for a patent.
I don't know what the law is in Finland, but in the United States it is unconstitutional for the government to mix patents and copyrights.
Re:Difference between patent and copyright (Score:1)
Americans.....[sigh]......
Miami Vice (Score:1, Offtopic)
Well, thats how I read it at first....
I need to go home....
Re:Miami Vice (Score:1)
nah, you've just been playing gta: vice city too much
Get everyone access to the source (Score:1)
2600.com hackers (Score:1)
Why should he answer the phone? Everyone knows those hackers at 1600.com are just a bunch of movie pirates who spend all their time stealing MPAA property. Good thing we have the DMCA to protect everyone ;-)
Re:I hope they throw the book at him (Score:2)
Try harder next time.
Re:I hope they throw the book at him (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I hope they throw the book at him (Score:1)
But CSS wasn't created to address DVD piracy. It was created to prevent DVD piracy. Maybe it's working, or maybe the technology to copy DVD's is just too expensive right now.
Re:I hope they throw the book at him (Score:1)
Re:I hope they throw the book at him (Score:1)
Re:I hope they throw the book at him (Score:1)
Can't afford DVDs? Pirate them! Do what Tim O'Reilly would do.
Join us! Join us!!!
Re:I hope they throw the book at him (Score:2)
They are? Funny, I though they were going down...
Re:I hope they throw the book at him (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I hope they throw the book at him (Score:1)
Re:I hope they throw the book at him (Score:2)
Isn't another tenet of economics is to allow your customers to actually use the product you sell? If it weren't for DeCss open source users would have no reason to purchase DVDs.
Re:Somebody fill me in? (Score:5, Funny)
You may also remember me from a meeting at work -- I was the one who asked you to repeat what the group had just talked about, because my disabilities prevented me from paying attention the first time.
I work in marketing.
Re:FP (Score:1)
Re:"Please let my cellmate be gentle" (Score:1)
I believe DeCSS falls under this category.
This is what you're trying to do.
I'm not going to bother explaining to you how DeCSS has ethical or genuine purpose. I will point out, however, that the creators of the internet did not keep it to themselves because it was new technology that they felt should be open to the public. People commit crimes via the internet daily. Do you feel that the innovators of the internet deserve to be behind bars as well? If not, PLEASE respond because I'm very interested in hearing your argument.
Re:"Please let my cellmate be gentle" (Score:1)
Innovation != Ethical. The words don't even look the same. There's a reason for that - they're 2 different concepts.
We aren't talking about a system that protects a cure for cancer because the greedy drug companies want to make a fast buck selling chemotherapy. The information disclosed is not in the public interest, the only ethical defence I can think of to DVD-Jon's actions. It's Hollywood movies. It will not represent the end of the world if you never see Titanic. The sun will still rise tomorrow if not one single person sees The Two Towers. How is CSS stifling? You can produce an unencrypted, region-free DVD movie all you want and distribute it to who you want. No-one's going to stop you. CSS doesn't prevent anyone from expressing themselves with DVD media.
Oh, you mean that if anyone anywhere does anything entertaining it's their duty to pay for the privilege of showing it to you. Sorry, I didn't get that earlier.
Won't or can't?
The inventors of the internet did not copy other peoples' stuff. They created it as a way to secure communications and to publish original research. What DVD-Jon did was the digital equivalent of manufacturing a bunch of lockpicks and instructions, and then he handed them out free on the corner of the world's biggest high-crime area. Criminal negligence.
Hey, and because everyone doesn't share my view, Norwey's giving him a perfectly fair trial where he can defend his actions. The system works and all that.
Anyway, my point was: DVD-Jon painted a big bullseye on his forehead when he published DeCSS, so hell bloody mend him.
Re:"Please let my cellmate be gentle" (Score:1)
Re:"Please let my cellmate be gentle" (Score:1, Insightful)
There are hundreds of DVD rippers on the internet, only one of which has valid ethical uses, and only one of which is illegal and is being attacked. That would be DeCSS. Other rippers that piggy back the signal to the video card or just plain grab the information bit by bit and burn it to another DVD are not being attacked by the MPAA and their croneys...why? Because only the DeCSS algorithm can be used to create free DVD players capable of actually playing movies...bye bye information monopoly...bye bye "millions of dollars speant on R&D" for a 40 bit system that can be brute force attacked in less than a week.
If anyone can create a DVD player using the DeCSS algorithm, or one like it, then the MPAA cannot force feed the DVD manufacturers bad licencing terms that cost millions and require they obey region encoding. No law protects region encoding, and in fact it is illegal price fixing. This is the only legitamate reason they have for attacking DeCSS because none of the other claims hold water - anyone can copy a DVD without using DeCSS or ever breaking the encryption scheme. They of course cannot play the copy without decrypting it, which any DVD player will do regardless of if it is a copy or not.
CSS is NOT a copy protection scheme, it is control protection. They have control and want to keep it... it is as simple, and evil as that.
NR
Substantial infringement& ridiculous hypotheti (Score:2)
I can think of potentially ethical uses of VX nerve gas but as I technology, I think it should be 'stifled', with extreme prejudice. Now my comparison is unfair in terms of comparing lethal agents to copying a song or video, but I'm trying to make a legitimate point: the primary usages of the technology should be ethical to pass muster... I think the Betamax case hinged on this notion of "substantial non-infringing uses" which is pretty much what I'd like to see. The DMCA, from what I can tell, kind of moves the standard from "substantial non-infringing uses of a device means its OK" to "these dozen or so very narrowly defined usage circumstances are OK but devices in general, since they can be used to infringe in broader situations, are not OK."
Which I'd agree with you sucks. I prefer what I consider the Betamax standard.
Failing that, I would like a legal protection for citizen rights to time-shift and space-shift media. And perhaps some sort of archival right, although I understand why archival rights might need some restriction to preserve streaming media usage scenarios. Still, I don't want to end up in 25 years prosecuted for training my brain to memorize movie scenes and play them back to myself for my enjoyment... (I can see it now: "Your memory cells are an infringement technology! Really? I thought that was only if I had them artificially enhanced? Can I be prosecuted under the DMCA for giving birth to kids and enabling them to pass on the lyrics of a Disney song to their friends by singing them in a playground? Infringing technology indeed!")
--LP
Re:Invalid form key: jKBCiUjhFE ! (Score:1)