Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Patents Your Rights Online

Palm Sued Over Multiplayer PDA Games Patent 15

Dr. Manhattan writes "Palm, along with several other companies, are being sued by Peer-to-Peer Systems LLC pursuant to patent 5,618,045. Seems that "an interactive multiple player game system including at least two playing devices communicating over an ad-hoc, wireless, all-to-all broadcast network" is not 'obvious.' Dang, I was planning on writing one..."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Palm Sued Over Multiplayer PDA Games Patent

Comments Filter:
  • Hmmm.... (Score:1, Offtopic)

    April's Fool is.... tmrw.

    Dang it... this is real.

    slashdot::rant.print();
  • Someone should really fix up the patent system so it does not stifle competition like it is doing now, but at the same time protect inventors.

    Perhaps modify the way patents are evaluated. How about limitting it to one year max (or less) for non-physical patents.

    Or even better, 6 month max before they have to allow open source implementations to come out uncontested. Then perhaps it would be fair increase it to two years max (or less) for non-physical patents.

    Vote Trajano! :-)
  • Hmmm (Score:1, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward

    Has anyone ever played chess or another game via radio, audio communications or other wireless method.

    Do we now have to pay royalties to play 20 questions on a long road trip?

    Are all non wired communications for the purpose of gaming going to be illegal.

    • It looks like you need a processor as well as software to synchronize the activity of the two machines. Plus it has to be broadcast based, not unicast.

      So if you play chess on a physical board via shortwave radio with another person you are fine. Likewise, you can play chess on two handhelds over a shortwave radio, as long as there isn't any software that automaticly synchronizes things. ie: each person would have to manually input the opponents moves.

      Based on the vague patent, it looks like having a LAN
    • Re:Hmmm (Score:1, Interesting)

      by GrassyKnowl ( 547325 )
      Looks like there are a bunch of programs played over packet radio that would invalidate the patent:

      from:

      http://www.cobrasoft.tmfweb.nl/download.htm

      PAKCHESS.ZIP

      PR4OPRIJ.ZIP

      PSB.ZIP

      These programs are dated 1992/1993

  • don't these things [cybiko.com] do that sort of thing already?
    • > don't these things [cybiko.com] do that sort of thing already?

      Yes, and if you had read the article you would know that Peer-to-Peer is also suing Cybiko.
  • It's much more narrow than the headline might suggest.
  • by BortQ ( 468164 )
    an interactive multiple player game system including at least two playing devices

    As opposed to all those multi-player games running on just one device...

    • Re:multi (Score:2, Informative)

      by John_Sauter ( 595980 )
      Spacewar, the first video game, was a multi-player game which ran on one device, the PDP-1 and its Type 30 display. The two players watched the screen together.
      John Sauter (J_Sauter@Empire.Net)
  • Would laser games such as Photon, Ultrazone, XP LaserSport, etc. be affected by this patent? Would they be considered prior art?

"The four building blocks of the universe are fire, water, gravel and vinyl." -- Dave Barry

Working...