Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Censorship Your Rights Online

China Does U-Turn, Lifts Ban On Websites 133

krou sends in a Guardian (UK) article reporting that overnight talks with the International Olympic Committee have resulted in the Chinese government lifting a ban on websites such as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the BBC Chinese language service "in Beijing, Shanghai and possibly further afield." Websites with information on the Falun Gong, Chinese dissidents, the Tibetan government in exile, and the 1989 military crackdown on the Tiananmen Square protests are still inaccessible. (We've been discussing Chinese Olympic censorship right along.) Quoting: "A spokesman for Amnesty International said: 'It's good news that our site has been unblocked in Olympic venues and perhaps elsewhere in Beijing, but it is still a long way from the "complete media freedom" promised. It seems public outrage has succeeded where the IOC's "quiet diplomacy" had failed.' Chinese engineers quoted in an article in the Atlantic Monthly said they had been told to prepare to unblock access for a list of specific internet protocol addresses to used by foreign visitors. But Andrew Lih, a new media author in Beijing, said it seemed the authorities might have simply decided it was easier to lift blocks for everyone. 'It's possible [to block individual locations] but would be very complicated,' he said."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

China Does U-Turn, Lifts Ban On Websites

Comments Filter:
  • U-Turn? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 02, 2008 @02:53PM (#24449747)

    That's no U-turn. At best, it's a hard left.

    • Re:U-Turn? (Score:5, Funny)

      by 4D6963 ( 933028 ) on Saturday August 02, 2008 @02:56PM (#24449799)

      That's no U-turn. At best, it's a hard left.

      So that's more like a L-turn then?

    • Re:U-Turn? (Score:4, Funny)

      by databyss ( 586137 ) on Saturday August 02, 2008 @03:46PM (#24450135) Homepage Journal

      What do you mean?

      We've always been at war with the Eurasians.

    • Re: (Score:2, Funny)

      by Doc Ruby ( 173196 )

      Thank you for admitting that China is a rightwing paradise, the kind everyone is heading for by letting corporate mafiosos control our countries.

      And for admitting that freedom is "left" of that kind of fascism on the political spectrum.

      Anonymous Cowards have their uses, even if they don't realize it.

    • Re: (Score:1, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward

      It's no turn at all, the ban will be back as soon as the olympic games end. This is a minor PR move which has no long-term effect. I mean come on, we've seen complete bans on entire genres of media this year in China. Is that all okay because a couple of wankers from the west are allowed to freely browse during the olympics?

      This is really irresponsible reporting.

    • Not even a hard left, imho.
      My father was in China some time ago, he said internet for business tuorists like him was "normal", but if you went out of your hotel, you started to have lots of restrictions.
      I think it's the same here. Internet will be "semi-free" just for tourists, and -obviously- just for the olimpic games...

      in short, nothing new...
    • by MrKaos ( 858439 )

      That's no U-turn. At best, it's a hard left.

      What about a big T for Totalitarian state.

      The whole Olympic torch relay really summed it up, armed guards protecting the torch from protesters around the world showing the true face of authority in China, a group of thugs prepared to put down anyone or anything that gets in their way. Meanwhile our companies undermine what little democracy and freedom we have remaining with outsourcing and business policies that validate the way the Chinese government conducts

  • What better way? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 02, 2008 @02:56PM (#24449787)

    What better way to nail subversives ?

    Let them convict themselves by allowing that whicvh is is deemed illegal in China ?
    The Historical approach..

    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      (1) Allow the entire region freedom online while the Olympics are going on
      (2) Profit!
      (2) Remember which of your own citizens accessed dissedent material,keep tabs on 'em.
      (3) After the Olympics leaves China consult the list of new dissidents.
      (4) Have them quietly made into unpersons.
  • Interesting... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by The MAZZTer ( 911996 ) <(megazzt) (at) (gmail.com)> on Saturday August 02, 2008 @02:58PM (#24449815) Homepage

    Didn't they say they were going to spy on visitors' traffic too? Nothing about that here, maybe they're hoping we'll forget.

    If I was going, I'd take tor [torproject.org] with me on my laptop. Also I'd buy a laptop first.

    • If I was going, I'd take a laptop, get Tor, a few packet sniffers, and a spare router an analyze the thing. Then probably post a script that DoSes the firewall.
      • Re: (Score:2, Funny)

        by Anonymous Coward
        American visitor dies in a robbery.
    • Why Tor? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Sycraft-fu ( 314770 ) on Saturday August 02, 2008 @03:56PM (#24450217)

      The Chinese firewall doesn't block encrypted traffic. A far superior solution is to simply VPN to somewhere. That's what I do when traveling if I am in any location that I don't completely trust (airport or hotel network for example). I SSH to a server I have at home and tunnel traffic through the connection. It is then as though I was surfing at my house.

      • Comment removed (Score:4, Informative)

        by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Saturday August 02, 2008 @06:38PM (#24451247)
        Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • by cshake ( 736412 )
      Let's worry about the US gov't taps on any data going through the backbones they have access to, which is any traffic through North America.
      If anyone sends any sort of sensitive data, anywhere in the world, it should be encrypted.
    • I agree, sounds like a slight L turn at best. I sure get plenty of their folks on my site. I was there last year, couldn't believe how many people gave me their email address (dying for someone to link with). Ash
  • by vivaoporto ( 1064484 ) on Saturday August 02, 2008 @02:58PM (#24449819)
    Right now I'm browsing the sites mentioned on TFA and nothing happ&/"$%& NO CARRIER
  • More Accurately (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 02, 2008 @03:02PM (#24449873)

    China Does U-Turn, Lifts Ban On Certain Websites

    Title is way too optimistic.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      We are no longer filtering Western propaganda. We want to show you how corrupt the Westerners are and how they lie.

      We are a peace loving people who love freedom and human rights. The Western Countries are saying bad things about us because they want to keep us down.

      Now, considering how nationalistic the Chinese folks are and how they consider that they should in fact rule the World, and the PC folks out there who are offended easily (they like it because they like to bully people), I expect this post to b

    • Re:More Accurately (Score:4, Informative)

      by Kleinbottler ( 1090817 ) on Sunday August 03, 2008 @02:34AM (#24453893)

      China Does U-Turn, Lifts Ban On Certain Websites

      Title is way too optimistic.

      Totally agree. As an expat Beijing resident with press connections the story moves by the day. Bottom line is that while generally open at the moment (i.e. in the Olympic press center) there are still sites that are blocked including a China blog at a major US news outlet. The Chinese generally allow VPN but if you go to certain sites you will still be stopped. Free proxy servers are tissue paper and generally not useful. The authorities, from observation and experience, can and do target individual computers. The Chinese are getting cleverer and more subtle at "shaping" the internet landscape and where you can go. Overall bottom line is that whatever little concessions might be made to the press center users the control of internet access will get worse not better. People who give credit to the Chinese for the access they have allowed are living in lalaland. The Chinese are grudging every concession and reneging whenever they can.

    • by hweimer ( 709734 ) on Sunday August 03, 2008 @04:37AM (#24454387) Homepage

      I configured Tor to use a Chinese exit node [quantenblog.net]. Here are my results:

      - Chinese Wikipedia [wikipedia.org]: accessible (used to be blocked)
      - BBC Chinese (via bbcchinese.com) [bbcchinese.com]: blocked
      - BBC Chinese (via direct URL) [bbc.co.uk]: accessible
      - Article on Tibet in English Wikipedia [wikipedia.org]: accessible (used to be blocked)
      - Human Rights in China [hrichina.org]: blocked

  • You mean people actually doing something had more effect than other people talking about doing something? Color me shocked.

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by jo42 ( 227475 )

      China's Olympic ambitions falter with protests
      http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080802/ap_on_re_as/china_battered_hopes [yahoo.com]

      said Wu Jiaxiang, a former government researcher and now a blogger and businessman. "We care less about human rights than other countries and more about sovereignty. That's bound to create an awkward feeling among other countries."

      They just don't get it, do they...

      • epic fail, to be sure.

      • In other news, Wu Jiaxiang was found dead in his apartment today; an apparent suicide.
      • Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)

        by corbettw ( 214229 )

        Every single one of the Chinese interviewed for that article needs to take a ride on the Waaaahmbulance. "Oh no, other countries are criticizing us, they don't like us, who's going to take us the prom now?" An entire country filled with teenage girls, just wonderful.

        No one forced them to host the Olympics, no one forced them to open their borders to our media (and our disdain). The only good thing I can say about the Chinese at this point is, at least they're not Muslims, because then they'd be burning down

        • Every single one of the Chinese interviewed for that article needs to take a ride on the Waaaahmbulance. "Oh no, other countries are criticizing us, they don't like us, who's going to take us the prom now?" An entire country filled with teenage girls, just wonderful.

          Don't you think for a second that the communist party made sure no one who didn't perfectly toe the party line would be interviewed???

          Unless there is **TOTAL** freedom of speech, not a single statement by anyone in China can be trusted.

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          by flyingsquid ( 813711 )
          In the wake of the tragic earthquake that hit China, I'd be tempted to go a little easier on China during the games. But now the government is using bribery and intimidation by the police to try to silence the parents of those children killed by faulty school construction.

          I can't imagine any worse torture than that. Your child was killed by a substandard building, put up by a corrupt government. And every month, you get a cash payment, a pension that reminds you of that fact. And it reminds you that instea

        • An entire country filled with teenage girls, just wonderful... (...) ... The only good thing I can say about the Chinese at this point is, at least they're not Muslims, because then they'd be burning down embassies and strapping bombs to their chests.

          Very insightful.

          I have been spending much thoughts as well comparing the Muslims with the Chinese. Both have a gripe with the west. Both have an education that imprints on their citizens/believers on how the west and others (in the case of china, Japan; in the case of Muslims, Israel) are to be blamed for their people's situation.

          Nevertheless, one big difference between these two peoples is that the Chinese believes in reciprocity and is eager to be integrated. On the other hand, Muslims completely lack und

  • by eebra82 ( 907996 ) on Saturday August 02, 2008 @03:27PM (#24450029) Homepage
    I sincerely hope that the Olympic Committee doesn't think this is a major success. As long as China remains blocking web sites and other types of censorship, they should be banned from ever setting up the Olympic Games while such governing is taking place.

    I'm looking forward to the Olympic Games in North Korea 2012. Apparently, Kim Jong Il is expected to beat 52 world records.
  • by Nymz ( 905908 ) on Saturday August 02, 2008 @03:37PM (#24450099) Journal
    1) Ban 1000s of websites
    2) Unban 3 of them
    3) Claim the ban is lifted, as the other sites are only inaccessible
    4) Fail!!!

    Note: for those not familiar with the pun - For Dummies [wikipedia.org]
  • Tempest in a teapot (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mu11ing1t0ver ( 1175051 ) on Saturday August 02, 2008 @03:40PM (#24450111)
    I'm surprised none of the stories about this mention how easy it is to VPN out of China and thus bypass any blocks they throw up.
    • by jopsen ( 885607 ) <jopsen@gmail.com> on Saturday August 02, 2008 @04:16PM (#24450351) Homepage

      I'm surprised none of the stories about this mention how easy it is to VPN out of China and thus bypass any blocks they throw up.

      The problem is that ordinary citizens in China doesn't know what happen on Tiananmen Square in 1989. Do you seriously expect the average Chinese citizen to be able to get VPN out og China, and risk his/her life/career on it because the sites are illegal.

      • seriously?

        i guess i shouldn't be surprised, though.

      • No, the problem is that the average Chinese doesn't care. China is like a mix of 1984 and Brave New World. There are strict laws, and people are too caught up in the high life of capitalism to pay attention.
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        by lumierang ( 881089 )

        I'm surprised none of the stories about this mention how easy it is to VPN out of China and thus bypass any blocks they throw up.

        The problem is that ordinary citizens in China doesn't know what happen on Tiananmen Square in 1989. Do you seriously expect the average Chinese citizen to be able to get VPN out og China, and risk his/her life/career on it because the sites are illegal.

        The ordinary citizens in China (at least those over 20) know quite well what happened on Tiananmen in 1989,just talk to any Chinese cab driver.

        Most Chinese don't think it has much relevance to today's business. While they agree the government in 1989 committed horrible crimes, hell it is two decades ago and both China and Chinese government has changed a lot [amazon.com]. Most of Chinese are happy with the current government [yahoo.com].

        As for Tiananmen square most think it will resolve over time . Even a lot of 1989 demo

        • +1 on Informative

          When I lived in China from 2003-06, I felt that every social issue there is so intrigue and inter-related that there's simply no solution than to wait out for population to shrink and grow economically prosperous on average. People I talked to about this issue generally have contradictory feelings -- on one hand they like the idea of "democracy" -- on the other they don't think it is the solution for China; they could point out failed examples like Mexico, India, Russia (under Yeltsin,) Phi

          • People I talked to about this issue generally have contradictory feelings -- on one hand they like the idea of "democracy" -- on the other they don't think it is the solution for China; they could point out failed examples like Mexico, India, Russia (under Yeltsin,) Philippines, Thai, eastern European countries, ... or maybe the US political system (long before Bush). In short democracy is good on principles but does not do much better on what the people found really matter -- quality of life, jobs, educat

            • Democracy is absolutely dependent on an educated populace. When people are illiterate and have no access to balanced information that shows both the good points and the bad points, it is totally illusory to think that Democracy may flourish.

              Agree with this.

              The Philippines have been bludgeoned for three centuries by the spanish into becoming a scatholic country

              not quite agree with this. at most, just a small excuse. you already provided most of the reason for the Philippines in your first paragraph.

            • Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)

              But are the scatholics[sic] raging bigots like you are?
      • I would argue that anyone who's in their early teens during '89 knows well what happened (I was). Quite frankly, now a day with the economic opportunity everywhere, few CARE TO REMEMBER (unfortunately). Many would argue that it was an unorganized uprising of bunch of young hot heads doomed to fail. Human right is important, but most Chinese, I would sadly argue, do not hold it nearly in such high places as the west does.

        You are right though, average citizen doesn't know what VPN is. Then again, same situa
      • by freakxx ( 987620 )

        "Do you seriously expect the average Chinese citizen to be able to get VPN out og China, and risk...."

        Why don't you use Firefox? I think, Firefox-3 is pretty cool and you must give it a try. It also highlights spelling mistakes like "og".

        • by jopsen ( 885607 )
          "og" is the Danish word for "and", sorry about the typo... It's just that when I type too fast some simple words like "and" end up in Danish...
      • by phorm ( 591458 )

        Probably not. Which makes it easier to tag and pay even closer attempt to those that *do* use VPN's

      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        by Daemonax ( 1204296 )
        Not actually true. I'm currently living in southern China, and the common people know what happened... The problem is that it's a social taboo to mention it, they're scared to talk about it, and they'll get angry if a foreigner brings it up and reminds them. It's a rather sad state of affairs, but I have met some people here that are very critical of the current situation with regards to freedom of speech and are willing to talk about the problems the country has. It's a shame that the common people won't t
      • by nairbv ( 596536 )

        You're right that the average Chinese citizen can't VPN out. Not only do they not know how, but they don't have a box in the US to VPN to, don't realize what site it is they're missing, and possibly can't even read the English on the site anyways.

        BUT, I've been living here for a year studying Chinese, and most of the Chinese people I've talked to DO know what happened in 1989. I mean, it wasn't even all that long ago. People would remember that kind of stuff, even if it wasn't discussed in their schoo

      • I'm living in China right now. I just asked my 23 year old Chinese girlfriend if most people know about the Tiananmen Square riots, and she said "everyone knows, but we don't know the details, like how many people were killed." From my (admittedly short) time living in China, my analysis of Chinese knowledge of their government's actions is this: I think Chinese hear the big stories, like how the Sichuan schools were poorly constructed. On the other hand, they don't hear about all the little things, like ho
        • Sometimes the "little stories" are probably not newsworthy as they are common occurrence.

          I admit I haven't heard about the "little things" you mentioned, but regarding the one year imprisonment without trial, I think it's called "re-education through labour", and it's a weird kind of "administrative sanction" which happens always, so it wouldn't be much news to the Chinese people.

      • People DO know what happened on Tianmen Square in 1989. It was a tragedy. People died in that event, but as many as you may think or the biased western media propaganda machine wants you to believe. It would be a real disaster for China if those now infamous "student leaders" took control. People are now more interested in making money and would rather leave that tragedy behind.
      • The problem is that ignorant Westerners assume that the Chinese don't know what happened at Tiananmen Square in 1989. First of all, they call it the "June 4 Incident", which as an educated, liberal person, you know already. Second, the generally accepted viewpoint is that the government stepped in and saved Chinese society from dangerous radicals, which of course as an educated person, you know as well. And of course you are well aware that it is not illegal to access blocked websites, the government mer
    • iptables -A OUTPUT -s x.x.x.x/x -d x.x.x.x/x -j DROP

      The above seems to work just fine, granted this is iptables but I would be very disappointed in CISCO if their switches/routers/firewalls couldn't support something as simple this. Makes me wonder if 'engineers' are just making up the difficulty level because they too are tired of this...

  • At least they are being consistent about being inconsistent.

  • See what a little pressure does to a country in the spotlight.

    all we need now is some way to make the Tiananmen Square "incident" essential to reporting on the games

    maybe that will count for something against the indoctrination of the chinese people

    • All we need is a new Olympic Event -- Tank Pulling. See it's a "sporting event" and I'm sure every foreign reporter could get the parallels. (We may even get some highly memorable "parody" stills.)

      --The FNP

      • All we need is a new Olympic Event -- Tank Pulling. See it's a "sporting event" and I'm sure every foreign reporter could get the parallels. (We may even get some highly memorable "parody" stills.)

        --The FNP

        or, the "Tank Face Down"

        attire is obviously a suit and briefcase...

        how long will YOU last?

    • Maybe, you are indoctrinated.

      Read up on other posts by people who actually have been in China and spoken to the people there.

      Reporting on an incident which is almost history as "news" is just idiotic. It should be on history books, and taught as such, not as a political tool for anybody, including you.

  • Whenever it faces a country big enough, strong enough or mean enough to stand up to it, the brave men of the IOC have a standard negotiation strategy that can best be summed up as "I'll blow you now. You can pay me back later."

    To absolutely nobody's surprise, the IOC is still waiting for its first oral experience that doesn't involve gargling with 3 gallons of Listerine afterward.

  • by curmudgeon99 ( 1040054 ) on Saturday August 02, 2008 @06:11PM (#24451069)
    Sure, I get it. China feels like it is getting a black eye. So they think they can put makeup on that black eye by suddenly opening access. We're not fooled. They are a censoring country and they're going to stay that way. The Leopard can't change his spots and China is not going to change what they're doing.
  • That's all any of this is. The minute the ad for China -- aka the 2008 Olympics -- is over, it'll be right back to status quo ante.

    And the public outrage won't be any more evident than it was before. It's only one billion or so PRC citizens being kept in the dark, not several hundred reporters.
  • This small advance for freedom (for some privileged people) in a tiny sector of China (in Beijing) for a brief, extraordinary period (while the whole world is watching) is better than nothing. And it's the result of pressure on China's mafia government by people who expect freedom, and won't accept less. Not even in a tiny sector for a brief, extraordinary period.

    This tiny victory might not last long at all. But it does prove that there's at least one way it can be done.

    Now the harder part is finding the ot

  • If you haven't already noticed, China has a habit of promising not to do something, then going and doing it anyway. What makes you think this time is any different? It'd be just like them to turn it off anyway just before the games start.

    It's amazing how easily Western politicians and bureaucrats are duped.

    • Proof. So there you go. Slashdot runs an article announcing China has lifted the ban, Slasdotters swallow it and then...
      "But the IOC warned that while these sites may be accessible to journalists in Beijing, the rest of the country would still be subject to China's filtered version of the Internet. Additionally, certain types of sites will remain blocked across all of China, including porn and those that are considered "subversive" or against national interests (such as sites related to the Falun Gong and
    • In fact, my impression of the habit of the Chinese government (in the past, say, 30 years) is that they usually deliver what they promised.

      I really can't say the same of western politicians.

      Prove me wrong?

  • During the Cultural Revolution, Mao Tze Tung launched a program called "Let One Thousand Flowers Bloom", where he encouraged dialog and dissent. It was, in fact, a ploy to let the real enemies of the government identify themselves so they could be further repressed.

    I think what could be happening here is a short program to appease foreign countries while the Olympics take place, and where thought-criminals will be identified by their web-surfing behavior.
  • I'll believe it when I see full retraction of internet bans.
    They're just trying to look good for the press, just like in all the other stories about china lately.

  • I think most people realise that as soon as the games are over any lifted restrictions will go straight back on.

    However, I was was in China for 3 months from January to April and found http://www.freeproxyserver.ca/ [freeproxyserver.ca] to work fine with all websites I tried it on.

    I'll be going back for another 4 months in October so I hope it's still working.

    Cheers,

    Alex

On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN.

Working...