Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Censorship China Cloud Communications Google Government The Internet

Gmail Access Starts To Come Back In China, State-Run Paper Blames Google 45

An anonymous reader writes Basic access to Gmail is starting to come back online in China on Tuesday after going down on Friday. The state-run Global Times China did not explain what caused the four-day outage, despite the fact that the government clearly implemented the block, and instead pointed to Google's unwillingness to obey Chinese law. All of Google's products have been severely disrupted in China since June. While users in Chinaare not able to access Gmail via the website, email protocols such as IMAP, SMTP, and POP3 had been accessible. The Great Firewall of China started blocking the IP addresses used by Gmail for these protocols, leaving users in China with no way of sending or receiving emails.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Gmail Access Starts To Come Back In China, State-Run Paper Blames Google

Comments Filter:
  • Blame is arguable. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by gurps_npc ( 621217 ) on Tuesday December 30, 2014 @02:19PM (#48697619) Homepage
    That is, if those slaves don't obey, the whipping they get is their own fault.

    Similarly, if Google doesn't obey all of China's laws and their service is cut off, it must be their fault, correct?

  • by Anonymous Coward

    You always hear this, but it's never specified.

  • by mrchaotica ( 681592 ) * on Tuesday December 30, 2014 @02:56PM (#48698007)

    If Google was blocked for not obeying Chinese law, but isn't blocked anymore... then what principles did Google compromise in order to get unblocked?

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Maybe nothing. China likes to do stuff like this on occasion to either prove a point or until someone jumps through enough hoops until the bureaucrats feel validated. Our company had a merger held up in China for months until some of our execs went over there and kissed ass for a week. A couple of fancy dinners paid for and suddenly everything was fine.

      • The funny part is that the only one who looks bad is China.

    • by jmcvetta ( 153563 ) on Tuesday December 30, 2014 @03:10PM (#48698133)

      Perhaps Google's attorney had lunch with the head Chinese censor and "forgot" to carry home his briefcase full of unmarked, non-sequential large bills.

    • It's probably affecting their own commerce... especially if you're a western businessman traveling through China and you can't access your own email.
      Many companies large and small use Gmail's servers for their own email service.

      • by tlhIngan ( 30335 ) <slashdot.worf@net> on Tuesday December 30, 2014 @05:43PM (#48699461)

        It's probably affecting their own commerce... especially if you're a western businessman traveling through China and you can't access your own email.
        Many companies large and small use Gmail's servers for their own email service.

        Their commerce, actually, not western commerce.

        You see, a bunch of companies in China do business by email, and a LOT of them use gmail because it frees them from having to pay for their own email service. (And Asians generally are cheapskates - they'll get by trying to spend as little money as possible).

        I've dealt with companies where their email system is a free Gmail account - you see username-company@gmail.com listed on their business cards or some variation thereof. Gmail is free, after all, so why bother paying for a domain and email server when people are willing to do it for free?

        Likewise, some do it using qq.com or other free Chinese mail provider.

        So yeah, turns out blocking gmail blocks a lot of companies from doing business.

    • by swillden ( 191260 ) <shawn-ds@willden.org> on Tuesday December 30, 2014 @04:06PM (#48698669) Journal

      If Google was blocked for not obeying Chinese law, but isn't blocked anymore... then what principles did Google compromise in order to get unblocked?

      I'm sure Google changed nothing at all.

      My guess is that this is just an escalation of the strategy of service degradation China has used against Google for a long time. Blocking access entirely provokes anger and spurs people to find workarounds, but if you randomly and intermittently make stuff fail the targeted service just seems crappy, which motivates people to find other services. As I understand it, that's exactly what happened here: China only blocked one of the IP addresses in Google's MX record. Since STMP is a store-and-forward protocol, with retries, the impact would be to introduce delays and degrade reliability. Just blocking it for a few days is another way of implementing this strategy, since it shows users that the service is unreliable. What happened once may happen again. Or worse.

      (Disclaimer: I work for Google but do not speak for Google and know nothing about this beyond what I read in the press. The information that only one of the MX IPs was blocked is something I read on Hacker News.)

      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        by Anonymous Coward

        I live in China. This is an ongoing attack on Google. It is not just email - Google fonts are blocked too. The poster is right about degraded services.

        With the possible xception of Wechat, ther is no Chinese internet service that would have survived without the government blocking outside entities such as Twitter, Facebook etc.

    • by Jawnn ( 445279 )

      If Google was blocked for not obeying Chinese law, but isn't blocked anymore... then what principles did Google compromise in order to get unblocked?

      Whad-a-ya got? We're easy.

  • by DarthVain ( 724186 ) on Tuesday December 30, 2014 @03:45PM (#48698441)

    This is likely China trying to exert its muscle to support Baidu the dominate search engine in China. China and Google have already butted heads about censorship in the past and Google withdrew services from China as a result.

    However the actions here go beyond the borders of China, in that it influences international trade, in that if I can't use Gmail to contact my clients in China, I would be forced to use something different.

    I would suspect that Google as a result highlighted this very fact to several jurisdictions heavily involved with trade with China, including the US, who no doubt sent very carefully worded messages to the Chinese government regarding what they thought of this trade influencing practice and how it relates to current treaties. To which I am sure China said, "Whoops!", blamed it on Google not meeting their laws, and promptly flipped the switch to turn it back on.

    What did this all accomplish? Not much. However China made it pretty clear that it has the capability to flip a switch and totally cut off someone from their market if they so choose... Which is a pretty nice stick to wave about belligerently.

  • "leaving users in China with no way of sending or receiving emails" - SMTP has been designed so that it has no single point of failure. Why one poor webmail service failure can affect SMTP users in China (stated in general)? That's their problem if they made themselves dependent on some 3rd party service they have no control of and it is good they finally see it.
    • "SMTP has been designed so that it has no single point of failure"

      From SMTP: [wikipedia.org]

      "An e-mail client needs to know the IP address of its initial SMTP server and this has to be given as part of its configuration (usually given as a DNS name). This server will deliver outgoing messages on behalf of the user."

      ...how?

      • by short ( 66530 )
        Initial SMTP server IP address can be localhost, what's the problem?
        • by tomxor ( 2379126 )
          The problem is that SMTP doesn't fix IP address block even if you send it yourself, the only way you are ever going to communicate with a blocked IP is through another IP. localhost only works if you don't want to send mail to gmail users and you never want to receive mail. These are gmail users by the way...
          • by short ( 66530 )
            For the reception: Everyone has (or should have) his own primary MX SMTP server (or at least small groups of people have their own primary MX SMTP server) so no single point of failure (no single IP adress) can break significant number of people.
  • It is likely the too big to fail at play. Gmail is used by lots of people and companies. When you are too big, government will have to keep you running by either not hurting you or, as in the US, by rescuing you.

  • by QQBoss ( 2527196 ) on Wednesday December 31, 2014 @03:19AM (#48702729)

    I am in Beijing. I know not of this restored service of which TFA speaks. Anything Google related website-wise (and including other services, like Google Earth) have been blocked on the PC since July or so (as opposed to just slowed down to 1 Kbyte/minute previously) but Google's client on cell phones worked without a problem. What was blocked on Friday was the phone client and any other services not covered by the previous block. As of my posting this message, everything G is still only accessible for me via VPN- Freegate or paid, either works fine. Funny thing, though, if I use Freegate, I can't use any services at slashdot (I had to shut off FG so I could post this message and see how a comment I made in another thread had been moderated).

    The only thing that I use frequently that is hit and miss functionally without a VPN is Google Translate, which I am guessing is because some big Chinese web sites claiming to do translation are actually just front ends to Google translate and thus stop working.

    • by QQBoss ( 2527196 )

      As an addendum to my previous comment, starting at approximately 11 pm Beijing time, three different VPNs I am using- one free, one paid, and one corporate- have all been blocked within China. Hopefully this is temporary. IT offices will have heads on the chopping block if this is still happening in 8 more hours (or less).

      As of 11:45 pm, two of my three VPNs are working again. The one that isn't is, of course, the one that people will get fired for. C'est la vie, time for bed.

      • by QQBoss ( 2527196 )

        And down they go again. Looks like China has decided that it is time to play a pretty damned nasty card.

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...